Copyright 2023 service.graduateway.com. Retrieved from https://studycorgi.com/the-speech-beyond-vietnam-a-time-to-break-silence-by-martin-luther-king-jr-rhetorical-analysis/, StudyCorgi. Society's punishments are small wounds compared to the wounds we inflict on our soul when we look the other way." Many of us have felt the anxiety to speak up against what we know is wrong. In Martin Luther King Jr.s speech Beyond Vietnam- A Time to Break Silence, delivered at Riverside Church in New York City on April 4, 1967, he claims that the American involvement in the Vietnam War is unjust. He attempts to call upon sympathy within the audience by using highly expressive language. Disclaimer: Services provided by StudyCorgi are to be used for research purposes only. He notes how essential it is to break silence before all hope is lost. His passionate tone flowed through these strategies, increasing their persuasive power on the people and encouraging them to follow/listen to his message on racial injustice. Favorite Quote:Make as many as mistakes as you want, just don't make the same mistake. The line, "For the sake of those boys, for the sake of this government, for the sake of the hundreds of thousands trembling under our violence, I cannot be silent," demonstrates how King uses parallelism. If he had not shown knowledge of the background of the war, it would be easy to dismiss his other pleas as lofty religious ideals. King wants his audience. Favorite Quote:Failures help one grow as a person. Moreover, Martin Luther King Jr meticulously chooses specific words that carry with them a negative connotation that helps associate the Vietnamese war with injustice. He offers many practical reasons for the opposition, as well as spiritual and moral reasons. Acting almost as a climax, King lyrically urges his audience to voice their opinions and wage a war against this unjustified war in Vietnam. To help his audience see that Vietnam is only madness, a wastage of resources and an ignorance of more pressing concerns, King once again affirms that war was never a means of peace. In his second paragraph, he connects with his audience by saying we have been repeatedly faced, For instance, in the second paragraph of his speech, he says, I could not be silent in the face of such cruel manipulation of the poor. The words silent, cruel, and manipulation speak out to an audience, especially for one that has faced hardship themselves in times of need. This is an obvious and extremely effective argument, especially among a group of Christian church leaders. While his words clearly deliver his disappointment over the path American government had chosen, it also expresses a clear intention to not be with the wrong and instead listen to ones inner voice. 663 Words; 804-506-0782 Here, Martin Luther King Jr is getting the audience emotionally and completely invested by showing the effect of America in Vietnam on their lives. In order to convince his audience that the civil rights movement in the United States should oppose the Vietnam War, the speaker appealed to their ethos, pathos, and logos. You are free to use it to write your own assignment, however you must reference it properly. The American intervention came at a time when the Vietnamese were expecting freedom and peaceful life and it came in a manner that was even devastating compared to the French occupation. He states, repeatedly, To begin, King uses figurative language in the first half of his speech to highlight the destructive nature of the war, strengthening his overall position. Martin Luther King was a determined activist for equality for all. He also says the war is further crippling the poor in the United States by sending a disproportional number of them to the front lines to die. Through this speech, and his ideals of determination, many rhetorical devices are put to use to drive forth these points. In this way, he appeals to the emotions of the audience and challenges the logic behind an unnecessary war. Thank you! He tries to make people see the other side of the picture where both black and white men were being pushed into hell without considering and questioning the outcome. Which of your works would you like to tell your friends about? Nothing evokes a more emotional response than the image of children suffering or being killed. Moreover, Martin Luther King Jr meticulously chooses specific words that carry with them a negative connotation that helps associate the Vietnamese war with injustice. Nothing could be lower than being placed parallel to the senseless violence of Nazi Germany. In other words, the resources were used for the soldiers, yet the poor still needed them just as so. King also links the issue to the question of Americas integrity. Since the founding of the Americas in the late 1400s, slavery was a problem; until the signing of the Emancipation Proclamation in 1862. Comparing the Justice System during the 1960s to a corrupt bank allows the audience to connect to what Dr. King is saying. He does this by appealing to certain issues the public see as important, using irony, and using diction and tone in persuasive ways. They all had the same goal, but took a different approach with their speeches, and how they would rally support to improve racial equality. He says we were taking the black young men who had been crippled by our society and sending them eight thousand miles away to guarantee liberties in Southeast Asia which they had not found in southwest Georgia and East Harlem. King uses this statement to point out the inconsistency with America trying to establish freedom far away before establishing freedom on their own home soil. Moreover, this set of diction allows King to logically state that he can not continue to fight on behalf of the oppressed if he himself doesnt address their oppressor, the U.S. government. Rodriguez 1 Melanie Rodriguez Ms. Jimenez Composition II 20 October, 2017 A Rhetorical Analysis of Martin Luther King Jr.'s "Beyond Vietnam" "Never be afraid to do what's right. It is a dream deeply rooted in the American dream. (King). King argues that all people are created equal and directly challenged the outdated and abhorrent views that upheld the false flag of racial superiority among White Americans. Rhetorical Analysis, Martin Luther King Rhetorical Devices Analysis, Rhetorical Analysis of Martin Luther King Jr.S Speech, A Rhetorical Analysis Journey Through Martin Luther King Jr.s SpeechI Have a Dream. He expresses that the first step toward equality as the earth moving and nations running with fear. When he argues that the war's immoral nature should be "incandescently clear," he implies to his audience that those who do not voice their opinion against the war are not concerned for, "the integrity and life of America.". Thank you! Thank you for sharing this page with a friend! Supplemental understanding of the topic including revealing main issues described in the particular theme; And, to argue that King 's most radical days were never fulfilled; that his next campaign was to confront the president over the Vietnam War and economic disparity, a direct confrontation with a president over an immoral war state Hill and Wang from the book review. He changes his tone from passive to passionate. While his I Have a Dream speech is considered his best one, his other speeches too offer a glimpse of his powerful rhetoric and his art of persuasion. He evaluates the psychological as well as social, political and economic implications of America's participation in Vietnam war. Widely known for his work in the Civil Rights Movement, Martin Luther King Jr eventually also gained momentum in the anti-war movement against the war in Vietnam. Martin Luther King Jr proves to all throughout his speech Beyond Vietnam --- A Time to Break Silence that the Vietnam war was unjust by his use of emotional diction, the allusion of Jim crow, and repetition. Rhetorical Analysis Of Beyond Vietnam A Time To Break Silence analytical essay Martin Luther King Jr.'s speech "Beyond Vietnam- A Time to Break Silence", he used a variety of techniques to reinforce the argument and persuasiveness of the American involvement in the Vietnam War. Let us not wallow in the valley of despair. (King). StudyCorgi. This use of repetitive language conveys urgency and shows that he deeply believes the churches may influence the government if they speak against the war. Throughout the first paragraph of Kings speech, he used emotional diction with words such as struggle, poverty, and poor to prove that the war in Vietnam was bringing down the Americans and their families fighting overseas. Additionally, when King claims that all this horror is in the name of America, he appeals to his audience's anger, leading them to believe that it is time for them to break silence on the fact that the United States became involved in an unjust war in Vietnam. He calls the situation some idle political plaything of a society gone mad on war. King was establishing his point that America was more troubled about healing and adjusting other countries, but would never invest the same in their own country. He is using historical facts to create a parallel between the current situation and the past. Acasestudy.com 2007-2019 All rights reserved. The Braveheart speech, while famous for being powerful, is very different from another powerful speech, the one from Dead Poets Society. "Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence" Rhetorical Analysis Introduction In this paper the speech "Beyond Vietnam" of Martin Luther king will be analyzed through the framework of Neo-Aristotelian criticism. On April 4, 1967, King addressed a crowd of 3,000 in Riverside Church by delivering a speech titled, "Beyond Vietnam," in the midst of the cruelty of the Vietnam War. Despite having a shining moment of experiments, hopes, [and] new beginnings during the struggle for human rights, King illustrates the Vietnam War as broken and eviscerate and a political plaything of a society gone mad on war. We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. Analyzes how john kerry's "beyond vietnam- a time to break silence" by martin luther king jr. uses rhetorical devices that emphasize the importance and meaning of his speech. So far we may have killed a million of them, mostly children (King). Go back to Mississippi, go back to Alabama, go back to South Carolina, go back to Georgia, go back to Louisiana, go back to the slums and ghettos of our northern cities, knowing that somehow this situation can and will be changed. https://studycorgi.com/the-speech-beyond-vietnam-a-time-to-break-silence-by-martin-luther-king-jr-rhetorical-analysis/. King Jr knew that war creates confusion and that his audiences mind was boggled with questions. The rhythm and frequent repetition are used to drive home his key points, stressing the importances of his goal. As a leader of his people, King took the stand to take radical measures to overcome the false promises of the sovereign government that had been addressing the issues of racial segregation through unimplemented transparent laws that did nothing to change the grim realities of the society. He also reminds the church leaders of something seemingly obvious that they may have lost sight of: the Father is deeply concerned especially for his suffering and helpless and outcast children (13). This comparison is very sobering. On April 4, 1967 at Riverside Church in New York, MLK delivered "Beyond Vietnam" , which created a different perspective on the Vietnam war, in which is a negative thing. Likewise, during this time period, America [put little effort into] rehabilitation of its poor creating an even harder life for them (Source A). These two techniques played a crucial role in furthering his purpose and in provoking a powerful response from the audience that made this speech memorable and awe-inspiring. The image of death, as powerful as it is, becomes amplified when Martin Luther King associates the injustices of segregation with the Vietnam war. He then outlines the history of the war in Vietnam, showing that he is not simply preaching about religious ideals. Public opinion steadily turned against the war following 1967 and by 1970 only a third of Americans believed that the U.S. had not made a mistake by sending troops to fight in Vietnam (Wikipedia). The war with Vietnam was just as unjust as unnecessary. When he argues that the wars immoral nature should be incandescently clear, he implies to his audience that those who do not voice their opinion against the war are not concerned for, the integrity and life of America. Finally, Martin Luther King Jr. uses parallelism within his own reflection to evoke emotions in his audience to show that . The war lasted from 1955 to 1975.The nation as a whole began to uproar over the war and the major consequences of the war. The audience felt empowered by the sentence alone. Please enter the email address that you use to login to TeenInk.com, and we'll email you instructions to reset your password. Not only were they fighting for their own rights in 1976, but they were sending away the son, husbands, brothers of other Americans thousands of miles away to the country of Vietnam to fight an unjust war for the rights of the people in Southeast Asia. Martin Luther King (MLK) was an activist and a minister who claimed that the war on Vietnam was wrong. He then goes on to reveal some of his more personal feelings. Rhetorical Analysis Of Beyond Vietnam: A Time To Break Silence, During the 20th century, the Vietnam War had a profound impact on Americans, but there was a side of the story that was less known- voices from the poor. How about receiving a customized one? No one should be restricted from rights and opportunities that others are given for that long. The author is using pathos as one of his central rhetorical strategies. In "Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence," Martin Luther King, a civil rights leader, uses his voice to bring attention to the injustices of race. The rhetoric helps prove how the poor lived worse in the, King, a supporter of President Lyndon B. Johnson and his Great Society, became concerned about U.S. involvement in Vietnam. However, he wishes that they would have lived up to his respect, and continues to hope that they will do so in the future. Through his compelling arguments and moral vision, King inspired many people to join the movement against the Vietnam War and to work for a more just and peaceful world. Rhetorical Analysis of MLK's Speech "Beyond Vietnam" December 22, 2016 By Richcoca PLATINUM, Canoga Park, California More by this author Widely known for his work in the Civil Rights Movement,. For instance, he does when he depicts the, "Negro and white boys on TV screens as they kill and die together for a nation that has been unable to seat them together in the same schools." By expressing how much he believes in the American dream and a new dawn, it reassures people that even though there is little progress at a time, King will always fight not only for himself, but his family, friends, and all those who are not held to the same respect. He expresses his anguish at seeing people of Vietnam and America suffer and also notes that if American folks do not break their silence they stand to lose much more than their opponents. Kings letter is a response to those in the church who have critizied him, Yet, instead of apologizing, he stands strong for his cause and turns it around on them stating his own critisim. This lecture became an explosive example of colorful language and visual examples that expanded the idea of rhetoric. Also, if you have a comment about a particular piece of work on this website, please go to the page where that work is displayed and post a comment on it. Thomas 1 Javon Thomas Mrs. Yelton English 1301 - Period 4 14 September 2018 Beyond Vietnam Rhetorical Analysis Essay In Martin Luther King Jr.'s speech, Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence, King discusses his views on America's involvement in the Vietnam War. King is effectively able to convey his point about his topic by using rhetorical devices such as logos, ethos, pathos. War was an inhuman and barbaric exercise and America's participation was not in human interest. King uses emotional words and descriptions to capture the audiences attention and convey the injustices caused by the Vietnam War. By claiming that the United States, "the greatest purveyor of violence," prefers, "massive doses of violence to solve its problems," King effectively establishes the U.S. government as the pervasive wrongdoer. First of all, King makes his point clear by appealing to the reader's common sense, beliefs and values (logos). Then Dr. King says that the church should oppose the war simply because it is counter to the ministry of Jesus Christ. Another rhetorical device is the common ground he establishes in his last sentence where he writes, "This is the story of Why We Can't Wait" (King 98-99). In multiple paragraphs of his speech, King effectively appeals to emotion by using personal anecdotes that involve him speaking to people of poverty directly. As he notes towards the end of his speech, "If we will make the right choice, we will be able to transform the jangling discords of our world into a beautiful symphony of brotherhood ". Later in his speech, King writes again using an advanced vocabulary to reinforce his academic background with, America would never be free or saved from itself until the descendants of its slaves were loosed completely from the shackles they still wear. By using the word shackles, the reader can easily create a vivid image in their mind of how restricted the poor must feel, and whether it be physically or mentally, they can understand how much the restrained are longing for a sense of freedom. The most famous speeches in the United States history all have utilized rhetoric devices and strategies. writing your own paper, but remember to His use of diction and imagery arouses anger while increasing his credibility since he criticizes the unjust war he describes. describing the ways in which the war is detrimental to the American people, King writes that "Vietnam. We try to make TeenInk.com the best site it can be, and we take your feedback very seriously. His use of diction and imagery arouses anger while increasing his credibility since he criticizes the unjust war he describes. But be assured that my tears have been tears of love (8). Don't let the fear of striking out keep you from playing the game. Public opinion steadily turned against the war following 1967 and by 1970 only a third of Americans believed that the U.S. had not made a mistake by sending troops to fight in Vietnam (Wikipedia). By claiming that the United States, the greatest purveyor of violence, prefers, massive doses of violence to solve its problems, King effectively establishes the U.S. government as the pervasive wrongdoer. All of Dr. Kings arguments are very effective. He also states, I say to you today, my friends, so even though we face the difficulties of today and tomorrow, I still have a dream. In this way, he personifies war as a demon that consumes people's lives and a nation's valuable resources which would otherwise be happy if it was not being ruined by bombs and bullets. The Speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence by Martin Luther King, Jr: Rhetorical Analysis. He is disappointed in te church and his disappointment is worse because he feels so strongly for the church, as is evident through his tears. Along with calming someone, you can inspire others with your, In Kings speech, the use of sensory and visceral language is abundant, creating an emotional and powerful atmosphere. submit it as your own as it will be considered plagiarism. These statements serve to communicate to the audience that the speaker is someone of authority and should be listened to. Read More Use Of Nonviolence In Cesar Chavez's Speech 409 Words | 2 Pages Martin Luther King Jr. was extremely passionate about nonviolence. Luther starts off by explaining that Vietnam heavily takes away valuable money of the US. ' (Document, The war in Vietnam to do this day has gone down as one of the influential and controversial wars in United States history. Introduction Martin Luther King, Jr in his speech "Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence" argued that US foreign policy was hypocritical when compared to the inequality present in the United States. King's criticism of the war as "broken and eviscerated," allows him to establish a disappointed tone that conveys the idea that the war is immoral and by doing so his precise word choice lets him to attack it as such. Rhetorical devices are included in Martin Luther Kings speeches to prove conflict. (2016, Nov 14). Rhetorical Devices In Beyond Vietnam Speech 736 Words3 Pages All they wanted was "to save the soul of America" (King, Beyond, 42). King calms the African Americans who are being oppressed by using the words, this situation can and will be changed. and Let us not wallow in the valley of despair. which gives them hope that there will be a new day when a change will take place. StudyCorgi, 4 May 2022, studycorgi.com/the-speech-beyond-vietnam-a-time-to-break-silence-by-martin-luther-king-jr-rhetorical-analysis/. He repeatedly stresses upon breaking the silence because in this situation being silent was a sin. Rhetorical Analysis Of Beyond Vietnam: A Time To Break Silence By Martin Luther King "Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence" is an article written by Martin Luther King Jr himself. In Hanoi are the men who led the nation to independence against the Japanese and the French, the men who sought membership in the French Commonwealth and were betrayed by the weakness of Paris and the willfulness of the colonial armies. Pathos is a method applied to represent an appeal to feelings and emotions in a speech and other various kinds of writing. Pharapreising and interpretation due to major educational standards released by a particular educational institution as well as tailored to your educational institution if different; Recognizing that citizens in poverty were not able to support their families while away from home at war, Martin Luther King included that war [and being enlisted in battle was] an enemy of poor to demonstrate how even though any man could be drafted, the economically stable left behind support for their family while the impoverished were ineligible of doing so (Source A). War makes the innocent lose hope and leaves behind horrific memories for generations on both sides. Dr. King genuinely believes that the war is in direct opposition to the teachings of Christ and therefore the church must speak out in a united voice against it. Issues have been resolved because now the draft is less common because more people volunteer for war so the poor are not forced. However, the persuasiveness of his speeches does not come solely from his ability to connect with his audience's emotions but from an extraordinary ability to reason and validate his point. By continuing well Dr. King further discredits the United States intentions in Vietnam by comparing us to Germany in World War II saying, What do they think as we test out our latest weapons on them, just as the Germans tested out new medicine and new tortures in the concentration camps of Europe? In this way, he tries to stress that even if we have progressed, we have grown nowhere better than the ancient barbarians that killed for fun. King, Martin Luther Jr. Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence. Church Meeting, 1967, Riverside Church, New York City. When he argues that the war's immoral nature should be "incandescently clear," he implies to his audience that those who do not voice their opinion against the war are not concerned for, "the integrity and life of America.". In Martin Luther King Jr's passionate speech about America's involvement in Vietnam, he manages to create a strong and compelling argument that America's involvement in unjust . He applies ethos to establish credibility, pathos to appeal to emotions, and logos to support his claims with hard evidence. His pleas are first to the audiences sense of logic and their immediate concerns for their own country. Kings criticism of the war as broken and eviscerated, allows him to establish a disappointed tone that conveys the idea that the war is immoral and by doing so his precise word choice lets him to attack it as such. Later, he mentions, I am a preacher by calling, I suppose it is not surprising that I have seven major reasons for bringing Vietnam into the field of my moral vision. (King). "The Speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence by Martin Luther King, Jr: Rhetorical Analysis." Right at the outset, King involves religious figures to establish the credibility for his reason and to prove that war was improper and inhuman. Here, at ACaseStudy.com, we deliver professionally written papers, and the best grades for you from your professors are guaranteed! One of Kings main techniques he uses to persuade the audience of his point is imagery. Rhetorical Analysis In King's Beyond Vietnam He strengthens his argument through his use of rhetorical questions and an anecdote. assume youre on board with our, Martin Luther King Jr. vs. President Obama, https://graduateway.com/rhetorical-analysis-of-martin-luther-kings-beyond-vietnam-a-time-to-break-silence/. Furthermore, when these stylistic elements are concluded with his use of parallelism, King effectively establishes Americas involvement in the Vietnam War as unjust. In front of over 3000 people at the New York Riverside Church King preaches to a room filled with clergy and laymen concerned about the Vietnam. Dream like you will live forever, live like you will die today. StudyCorgi. Rhetorical Analysis Of Mlk's Beyond Vietnam. He means to make people ask questions of themselves and ponder over the meaninglessness and uselessness of war and what would remain behind once the war was over. For example, this quote personifies war as being an enemy. By repeating the phrase, "for the sake," he creates a rhythmic flow that causes his audience to be more receptive to his idea. He then paints a picture of the suffering endured by Vietnam and tells how the United States has a long history of doing the wrong thing to this tiny country. The irony is explicit in Kings words that the war is just an attempt to cover and hide the more pressing issues before America. It encompasses all humanity and not just America. Likewise, the image of men, both black and while, "in brutal solidarity burning the huts of a poor village," helps establish the war in Vietnam as a complete disaster and atrocity. Rhetorical Analysis Of Beyond Vietnam: A Time To Break Silence By Martin Luther King "Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence" is an article written by Martin Luther King Jr himself. Rhetorical Analysis Of Martin Luther King Beyond Vietnam 534 Words | 3 Pages In 1967, Martin Luther King Jr. delivered his speech "Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence." In the speech, King argues against American involvement in the Vietnam War and explains why he cannot remain silent. He is using vivid language to describe the casualties; however, they are also supported by evidence, as he is using precise numbers in this part of the speech. The author here is using statistics to present the horrifying picture of the Vietnam War. The war in Vietnam to do this day has gone down as one of the influential and controversial wars in United States history. Then the segregation of African Americans and White Americans started. In addition, his use of parallelism allows him to appeal to his audience's pity for the oppressed in order for him to express his call to action, a call for activism that goes beyond Vietnam. Apart from being an advocate of Mahatma Gandhi's idea of nonviolence, Martin Luther King Jr was a great leader and rhetor of all times. Moreover, Martin Luther King Jr meticulously chooses specific words that carry with them a negative connotation that helps associate the Vietnamese war with injustice.
Wildewood California, Md Hoa,
Warren Police Officer Facing Charges,
Tennis Vs Badminton Calories,
Articles B